<-- End Marfeel -->
X

DO NOT USE

Trump’s Late-Night Dismissal Of 18 Inspectors General Sparks Legal Concerns

Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images

On Jan. 24, Donald Trump fired 18 federal government inspectors general, which raised concerns over potential corruption early in Trump’s second stint in the White House from progressive voices like Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

View Quiz

According to NBC News, the White House confirmed the report of Hannibal “Mike” Ware, the head of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency. Ware was one of at least 12 inspectors general who were relieved of duty by Trump.

According to an unnamed White House official, the firings were an attempt to eliminate parts of the Biden administration that did not “align” with the Trump administration.

The official also informed the outlet, “We’re cleaning house of what doesn’t work for us and going forward.”

ass="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter">

Trump positioned the highly irregular firings as normal in comments to the media. They are not normal, as inspectors generals function as independent watchdogs in various government agencies. “I did it because it’s a very common thing to do,” Trump said on Jan. 25 aboard Air Force One.

He continued, “Some people thought that some were unfair or were not doing the job. It’s a very standard thing to do, very much like the U.S. attorneys.”

In a letter to legislators on Capitol Hill and the White House, Ware questioned the legality of the firings.

“At this point, we do not believe the actions taken are legally sufficient to dismiss Presidentially Appointed, Senate Confirmed Inspectors General,” Ware wrote.

In addition, he released a separate statement arguing that the removal of the inspectors general constitutes a significant threat to independent government oversight.

Ware cautioned that “removals inconsistent with the law are a significant threat to the actual and perceived independence of IGs.”

He continued, “IGs are not immune from removal. However, the law must be followed to protect independent government oversight for America.”

Mark Lee Greenblatt, who was fired from his position as the inspector general of the Interior Department, was blunt in his assessment of the dismissals to NBC News.

“The key question here is, who does the president appoint in t

he place of the IGs that he’s removed?” Greenblatt asked, in reference to the inspectors general. “We’re so-called watchdogs inside the federal agency. So does he appoint true watch dogs, or does he appoint lap dogs?”

Greenblatt continued, “If a member of the Trump administration is accused of ethics, misconduct or some sort of criminal violation, will the IG be willing to investigate that in a fulsome and comprehensive manner? Will they be willing to come to findings, negative findings, about that Trump political appointee?” Greenblatt, a Trump appointee during his first administration, asked NBC News. “That is the key question. That’s where the rubber meets the road.”

Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer was even more direct in his criticism of the firings during a speech delivered on the Senate floor on Jan. 26.

“Yesterday, in the dark of night, President Trump fired at least 12 independent inspector generals at important federal agencies across the administration. This is a chilling purge, and it’s a preview of the lawless approach Donald Trump and his administration are taking far too often as he’s becoming president,” Sen. Schumer cautioned.

RELATED CONTENT: Trump To Become 1st Felon In Executive Office After Supreme Court Rejects Bid To Postpone Sentencing

Show comments