<-- End Marfeel -->
X

DO NOT USE

The Apprentice 2010: Task 1 Performance Review

The 2010 edition of The Apprentice, NBC’s business reality show starring and executive produced by real estate mogul Donald Trump, premiered on Thursday, fielding 16 candidates competing for a $250,000 job contract with the Trump organization. By now, the format is familiar: Each week the contestants, divided into two teams, must complete a business task. The winning team is rewarded; the losing team must report to the infamous boardroom, where one member will be fired by Trump, who is assisted by his children and Trump organization executives Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. The 2010 version of The Apprentice returns to its original premise of a competition of business professionals and entrepreneurs, eschewing the celebrity competition of the past three installments of the reality TV show. The common thread connecting the 16 candidates for this season is that all of them are trying to jump-start careers stalled or disrupted by our nation’s most recent recession. The 2010 edition of The Apprentice features three African American job candidates:

View Quiz

Kelly Beaty, 30, holds a bachelor of arts degree in political science from Spelman College and a master’s in public communication from American University. A former intern at Black Enterprise, she established a career as a rising star in the high-profile public relations industry before losing her job.

Gene Folkes

, 46, earned a bachelor of science degree in business from Morris Brown College and served in the U.S. Air Force before launching a career as a financial advisor. The Jamaican-born Folkes has been living off of his savings and trying to launch an assisted living facility since being laid off.

Liza Mucheru-Wisner, 30, founder of an educational technology company who was born in Kenya and, as part of the Kenyan National Golf Team, was recruited to play golf at Texas A&M Corpus Christi, where she earned bachelor’s and master’s degrees.

Beginning this week, and with each task of The Apprentice 2010, I will post performance reviews of the candidates, their teams and their project managers. In addition, I will assess the performances of Kelly, Gene and Liza for as long as they remain in The Apprentice talent pool. You can also follow and discuss my commentary on Twitter and Facebook.

Read and comment on other performance reviews of The Apprentice 2010 Tasks.

Leadership Lesson: Delegating responsibility for a decision does not equate to giving up accountability for the decision.

The competition starts out with the candidates divided into teams by gender. The men choose to name their team Octane; the women choose Fortitude.

TASK 1: Design and build an “ultra-modern” workspace at the Trump Building at 40 Wall Street in lower Manhattan. The teams and their results will be judged on “execution, functionality and originality.”

Since no one on the men’s team seems to want to take on the role of project manager for the first task, Wade Hanson, a 33-year-old realtor, nominates Gene, in part because of his military experience. Gene is nearly unanimously supported as leader (with the exception of David Johnson, a 34-year-old unemployed sales professional). However, the members of Octane

are initially frustrated by what they feel is his failure to provide a clear vision and strong direction. When Gene pushes for a “green theme” for their project, James Weir, a 31-year-old attorney, complains that “Gene has no idea” what that means. Gene, for his part, admits that working full-time after three years of unemployment takes some adjusting. His communication and collaboration skills seem rusty. Early on, Gene fails to give clear direction, nor does he offer solid ideas or effectively solicit them from his team. This lack of firm, clearly defined leadership erupts in a dispute between Clint Robertson, a 40-year-old real estate attorney and developer, and David over the task of securing plant and floral arrangements for the space. Finally, with David acting in clear insubordination to his authority, Gene is forced to assert himself, confronting David and ordering him to sit out the task before dismissing him and walking away.

Despite the team’s frustration and the conflict between David and Clint, Octane continues to respect Gene’s role as project manager and remains focused on doing the work necessary to win the task. The next day, Gene finally lays down his ground rules: “If you take a task, own that task, and I’m going to ask fellow teammates to respect that person with the task. I will hear you, but when I say ‘go’, the discussion’s over.” The collective sentiment of his team: It’s about time. Even David stays in line for the rest of the task. Octane delivers a hip, non-traditional workspace with plenty of indoor plants, natural light through windows decorated with open picture frames, funky throw rugs and walls painted with an abstract geometric pattern.

In the meantime, Nicole Chiu, a 27-year-old attorney, quickly volunteers to serve as Fortitude’s project manager; the other women are happy to let her lead on the first task. Nicole quickly establishes a reputation in the minds of her team for being dismissive of the ideas and experience of her team members (most notably, 41-year-old real estate agent Tyana Alvarado);  unwilling to make decisions as project leader (her constant refrain: “What do YOU think we should do?”);  and all too willing to take credit for work and decisions delegated to subordinates if successful, but fully prepared to blame those same subordinates if the work and decisions are deemed failures. For example, after deliberately rejecting Tyana’s creative ideas during initial planning for their project, she then defers to her on furniture selection, props and other interior design decisions, not because she believes in Tyana’s ideas, but because she wants a convenient scapegoat in the event her team loses. Throughout, Nicole demonstrates either obliviousness or indifference toward the objective of the project, namely to design “an ultra-modern workspace,” repeatedly approving subordinates’ decisions when she knows they are wrong (for example, approving Tyana’s selection of a 1950s-era portrait of an anonymous, middle-aged white male executive as the dominant art piece for the space). Her plan: to take credit as project manager if her teammates ideas worked, and to scapegoat them if the ideas were rejected. Despite

clear dissatisfaction with their leader, Fortitude works as a cohesive team and completes their task, delivering a workspace with an “executive luxury” theme they believed to be consistent with the Trump brand.

The Result: Trump was not impressed with either space, but clearly saw Octane’s space as the more hip, ultra-modern one. Gene earns his first victory as project manager. He deserves credit for recovering from a disastrously passive approach to team leadership to establish his authority and expectations, enabling him to deliver a strong finish as project manager.

Who I Would Have Fired: As always, I decide who to terminate before I watch the boardroom scenes (literally pausing my DVR) during which Trump makes his decision. This one was easy: Nicole deserved the axe. There’s nothing wrong with delegating decisions to subordinates if you honestly believe in their skills and judgment and are willing to stand by the results. But to delegate just so that you can blame your subordinate if the project fails is a reprehensible approach to leadership. Ethical leaders know that even if they delegate decisions, they remain accountable for the results. Leaders who openly and brazenly scapegoat their team members get what Nicole faced in the boardroom: a mutiny.

Interim Evaluations of the Black Candidates:Kelly and Liza did not distinguish themselves on this first task, but did demonstrate a willingness to work hard and do whatever it took to complete the task. Kelly, in particular, seemed to maintain a positive, upbeat attitude despite the tension created by hostility between her teammates.

Show comments