Obama Lends Cities A Helping Hand, Warns Against Waste

In many ways, the nation’s mayors may feel the hardest hit by the current state of the economy. As President Barack Obama told 85 of them who gathered at the White House Friday, they are often forced to make some of the most difficult choices during an economic crisis, such as whether to raise taxes, close schools, or cut back on essential services. For them, the $787 billion economic stimulus package is an opportunity to not only save vital programs and services, but to also attract new business and jumpstart projects that have fallen by the wayside due to lack of funding.

But even as the made clear to the mayors that they do indeed have a friend in Washington, he also warned them to spend the money wisely and that he will not hesitate to “call them out” if they do otherwise or to use the full power of his office to stop any waste.

To help mayors manage the funds as well

as the growth of their cities beyond the stimulus package, Obama has established by executive order a White House Office of Urban Affairs that will focus on federal investment in urban areas and serve as a liaison between the administration, federal agencies, and the nation’s mayors. Bronx borough president Adolfo Carrion Jr., an urban planner by training, who is also president of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials, will head it. Obama has tapped Derek Douglas, director of New York Gov. David Patterson’s Washington office, to serve as special assistant to the president for urban affairs.

The move signals the key role that Obama believes mayors and cities — home to 80% of Americans — will play in restarting the economy, building sustainable growth, and the ultimate success of the stimulus package. Carrion has also been tasked with creating an advisory council made up of mayors and other urban leaders to develop and share best practices and policies that impact urban life.

“Vibrant cities spawn innovation, economic

growth, and cultural enrichment; the Urban Affairs office will focus on wise investments and development in our urban areas that will create employment and housing opportunities and make our country more competitive, prosperous, and strong,” Obama said in a statement about the executive order.

Douglas Palmer, mayor of Trenton, New Jersey, believes the federal government has neglected cities during the past several years, focusing more on issues of homeland security than hometown economic security.

“I think [the executive order] is a true sign and commitment by Obama that he wants his administration and himself to partner with America’s mayors who are responsible for about 80% of the gross domestic product in our country,” Palmer says. “It also shows a realization that in order to get this stimulus package moving, and getting people back to work and helping cities be sustainable, they need an individual who has direct access to him who will work with all of the departments, whether it’s transportation, energy, HUD, commerce or others, to see that the stimulus plan is working and doing what needs to be done.”

He believes the Office of Urban Affairs will provide much-needed oversight to “recognize and handle problems quickly so they can change what’s not working and strengthen what is.” And, Palmer adds, while his Republican counterparts may not say so on the record, many of them agree.

But Palmer and others worry that stimulus funds, most of which won’t be disbursed directly to their cities, could get bogged down state government bureaucracy or allocated

to projects that they don’t believe will create sustainable jobs or help the people who need it most. This past weekend, a handful of governors said they’re considering passing up the money.

According to Margaret Simms, an economist at the Urban Policy Institute, some might argue that the United States hasn’t had any real urban policy in a long time. During the early ’60s and early ’70s, a period considered to be the height of urban policy, she says, the federal government provided a lot of funding directly to localities, which enabled them, in turn, to allocate those funds in ways they believed more fairly and appropriately addressed their needs and in a more time-effective manner. “State officials would argue differently, but localities see their best chances for progress coming from a direct federal/local relationship,” Simms says.

Her advice to the nation’s mayors is that they decide, as a group, on a few top priorities and primary concerns to work on with the Office of Urban Affairs, so there’s a coherent and consistent voice about their needs.

“I think it’s really important that people look at where we are now. We don’t know whether [the stimulus package] will be effective, whether more will be needed, or whether the stimulus package will basically displace some other programs’ specific initiatives,”  Simms says. “So asking for lots of different things probably isn’t going to work. That approach would be more effective than every mayor or every small group of mayor’s talking about their problems. Priorities will have to be set.”